Discover
Most AI tools summarize what is known. This one is for adding to it.
Creating new knowledge has three ways to die. The question was already answered, and you find out in year two. The foundation had a flaw nobody pressure tested, and it surfaces late, in review. Or a source that does not exist reaches the report, and everything else in it is now suspect. The tools people reach for make the third one more likely, not less.
Why
These reports needed a process. I engineered one.
I spent 47 years as a business consultant and an entrepreneur CEO, and I have written every report type on this page. Market sizing, due diligence, business cases, competitive landscapes, feasibility studies: as the consultant hired to produce them, or as the executive betting a startup on them. I know what each one costs to build by hand, and I know what it costs when one is wrong.
When the models arrived, everyone assumed the reports would write themselves. They do not. A model alone drifts, invents a source under deadline pressure, and agrees with whoever is prompting it. The model is labor, not the product. What was missing was the same thing that was always missing: a repeatable process.
So I engineered one. 32 steps across 5 phases, from the Socratic dialogue that pressure tests the question to the finished report. The claims are declared before the searching starts, every source lands on a ledger with its engine, fetch time, and content hash, and the AI proposes while a person decides. Where the AI works and where you decide is specified at every point.
Then I proved it where there was no margin for error. My own doctorate runs on this process, and peer review found the work sound twice in 2026. A process that satisfies academic reviewers is not going to flinch in front of a board.
Value delivered
The problem it solves
Decisions wait weeks for research an outside firm assembles by hand, or the research gets skipped and the bet is made blind.
The value it delivers
A finished report whose every claim traces to a named source, built by a repeatable process instead of analyst heroics, in 25 formats a board already recognizes, delivered the way your security posture requires.
Why talk now
Bring the decision you are about to make. Thirty minutes shows you which report answers it and what the evidence rules would be.
Schedule a Strategic ConversationWhat it does
This is what the process looks like when the product is new knowledge.
It questions you before it helps you. Socratic dialogue surfaces hidden assumptions and pressure tests the research question before you spend time building on a flawed foundation.
32 steps across 5 phases, from idea to finished report. Socratic dialogue, agentic search, human evaluation, research architecture, and the final write up. Where the AI works and where you decide is specified at every point.
Every claim is tested, not hoped for. The search fans out across the sources you choose: filings, market data, the open web, and your own data. Each source is screened against the claims your report has to settle, rated on its tier and how recent it is, and marked as supporting or refuting. Where two sources disagree on a number, you choose, and the choice is recorded.
Sources only from real databases. Every source is traceable. None are generated, so a source that does not exist cannot reach your report.
AI augments, humans decide. No AI output advances without your judgment. The argument stays yours, which is what makes it defensible when the decision is challenged.
Every action is on the record. Timestamped and attributed in one provenance ledger, in the same place your team, your reviewers, and your collaborators work. No spreadsheets.
Proof
47 years producing these reports, as the consultant hired to write them and as the CEO who bet companies on them. Two successful exits: the benchmarking company sold to Kaufman Hall and Madison Dearborn Partners in 2016, and the business intelligence platforms built at Vizient, acquired into IBM Watson Health. Six profit turnarounds that took failing companies to top quartile. This process is how that work gets done now.
Business research
Twenty five reports, ready to run
The same engineered lifecycle now produces business research. Pick the report, and its sections, claims, and evidence rules come with it: what counts as proof, which sources qualify, and how fresh they have to be. Every claim in the finished report traces to a source with its engine, fetch time, and content hash on the ledger.
- Market sizing
- Industry analysis
- Competitive landscape
- Trend and signal scan
- Customer and buyer research
- Voice of customer synthesis
- Product market fit assessment
- Pricing and willingness to pay
- Strategic research plan
- Business plan
- Business case
- Go to market plan
- Scenario and risk analysis
- Feasibility study
- Build, buy, or partner
- Investment memo
- Due diligence
- Company profile
- Benchmarking study
- Technology assessment
- Vendor and tool evaluation
- Regulatory and compliance brief
- Patent and IP landscape
- White paper
- Policy brief
Each report type is a definition, not code, so it can be cloned and adjusted to your house standard without a release. Your own data joins the evidence with its origin recorded. And where the question needs primary research, the 8M engine asks your customers, buyers, channel, and staff directly.
How it arrives
From a finished report to a platform inside your walls
Report as a service
Commission the report. We run the pipeline and you receive the finished document with its provenance appendix, every claim traced to its source.
Software as a service
Your team runs the platform: your questions, your engine choices, your own keys, your reports.
Private environment
The platform deployed on your servers, routing to your own models, so research content never reaches a public endpoint.
Airgapped
A custom structure for environments where nothing leaves the building: your models, your sources, the same ledger and the same traceability.
Bring the question you think nobody has answered. Find out together.
Thirty minutes. Bring the research question, or the project you suspect is standing on a flaw nobody has named yet.